Quantcast
Channel: Mob Wives Sit Down
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 241

Natalie Guercio Releases Statement About the Recording of Her Shown on Mob Wives

$
0
0
On last week's episode of Mob Wives you may remember when Natalie Didonato showed Drita a recording that her friend had of Natalie Guercio admitting that she called his PO and lied about being abused. After that episode aired a few of our readers remembered that we had posted the recording on our blog a week before this episode aired right here. Although we the viewers didn't get to hear what the recording said, we knew that it was the same one that Nat D. sent us because she had posted it again on her twitter right after the episode aired.
Since that episode aired Natalie Guercio has been trying to convinced us that the recording is fake and edited too much. On Friday at 3:41 AM, she even took to twitter to try to tell her fans (as seen above) that she was going to get her ex (the guy who is on the tape) to come forward and make a statement to clear his name to prove that it wasn't him on the tape. Guercio even told her fans on twitter that her son got verbally abused by her ex.
When Nat D. heard that Guercio was going to get him to come forward to clear his name, she took to twitter  (at 5:16 PM Friday)herself to say that Guercio's ex won't be making any public announcement on her behalf. 
About an hour later (6:43 PM on Friday) a fan tweeted Nat D. letting her know that supposedly they heard that Guercio was going to be releasing a video from her ex "any minute" saying that the video was chopped and edited. Nat D. replied to the fan above simply saying that she just talked to her friend (the guy who is on the tape who is Guercio's ex) and that they can't wait for Guercio to release the video of his side. Here is the thing about all of this, Guercio is known for dating around. The question I have is, which one of her ex's is Guercio going to choose to have come forward to clear his name? It's almost like a casting call of ex's that she can choose from to say "hey can you be on this tape to say you're not on the tape to clear my name".
Earlier this morning (at 2:33 AM) Guercio posted above on twitter a statement about the recording. It's a very long statement that looks more like an essay. So long that we couldn't capture the whole thing in one snapshot from her twitter above. Not to worry though, we have the full speech towards the end of this post. I'm guessing she didn't get to ask one of her ex's to come forward to make a video so she wrote an essay herself?
Even her fans tried to tell her that the statement was so long that she must have a lot of free time on her hands to be able to write something this long. 
Seen above, is the full statement that Guercio allegedly wrote herself and posted on twitter. All eight paragraphs. I told you it looked more like an essay than a simple statement. Some people are questioning if Guercio had help writing this statement just by the way it's worded. In the first paragraph she says that the recording is so broad that someone obviously "tampered with it" and that it can be "misconstrued". Guercio goes on to say that it wasn't until the episode aired that she heard the recording, even though it was on our blog and YouTube for a week before it was shown on TV. In the second paragraph Guercio tries to say that "this wasn't the first time he put his hands on her". In fact, Guercio says that her ex had just been released from doing 57 months in jail and had just moved into her home from the halfway house. She says that she put up with the abuse for 9 months until she decided to call the police because she was "in fear of her life". Here's where this statement gets interesting. When the police came Guercio says that they only wrote a report, but didn't arrest him or detain him because (even though she says he choked her and popped blood vessels in her eyes) she told the cops nothing happened. Therefore, Guercio says that she never pressed any charges. In the third paragraph, Guercio explains that was on supervised release and had to report to his PO because he had been "in contact with the law". Two days after the police came where she told them nothing happened, she says "the PO" came back to her home while her ex was at work. On this day, Guercio explains that "the PO" saw bruises on her face (the ones we posted on here when we posted the recording). Notice how she says "the PO" not his PO. "The PO" kept encouraging Guercio to press charges but she refused. Guercio says that "the PO" told her that even if she didn't press charges against her ex for the bruises, they were still going to get him for traveling to Atlantic City, NJ without permission. When asked if she knew that he went to Atlantic City, Guercio says that she told the PO that she did know about it. Guercio begged with the PO not to tell her ex that they came by her house because she was afraid of what he would do to her when he found out. In the fourth paragraph, Guercio says "long story short" as if this story isn't already long enough to read. Remember I said there's eight paragraphs in this statement, we're only on the fourth. So bare with me as we sort through the next four paragraphs. According to Guercio, after "the PO" came over while her ex was at work and saw the bruises, she says that they got into another altercation where she ended up throwing him out and he went to his mom's. By that time, Guercio says that "the PO gave it some time" and called her ex into his office "to violate him". Guercio says "the PO" gave him 90 days on house arrest. We don't know what this alleged PO violated him for but we're guessing it was for the trip in Atlantic City. Guercio says that because of this 90 days on house arrest, her ex thought she ratted him out about the trip to Atlantic City. Guercio says this is why her ex recorded her on that tape. Guercio claims that in the "REAL recording" her ex is asking her if she ratted him out to his PO about going to Atlantic City. Guercio tells her ex on the alleged real recording, that she didn't tell his PO. As we know from listening to the recording ourselves, she admits that she called his PO and that she lied. However, Guercio says that she left out the part where the PO originally asked her about knowing he was in Atlantic City because she was afraid. She ends this statement by saying that her ex was never locked up or put on house arrest because of her, but because of his poor decisions. Didn't she just say though that they had a fight and she kicked him out and then that's when this alleged PO put him on 90 days house arrest? Which one is it? She ends this statement encouraging everyone to listen to the "remix" recording again. Since when do recordings have sound effects with remixes on them? Well there you have it. Her eight paragraph statement that looks more like an  essay. Don't forget to watch the season finale of Mob Wives Wednesday at 8 PM only on vh1.  

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 241

Trending Articles